<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Family Medicine current issue</title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Family Medicine RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Nov  1 2000 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Family Medicine</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1063-3987</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/957?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/961?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/962?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/964?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/971?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/979?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/989?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/997?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1002?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1009?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1015?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1022?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1036?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1043?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1052?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1059?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1066?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1071?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1079?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1093?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1135?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1148?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1156?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1164?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1181?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1197?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Family Medicine</title>
<url>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/957?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Dear Readers]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/957?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Bowman</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.957</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Dear Readers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>957</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>957</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/961?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Dear Readers]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/961?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>DeAngelis</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.961</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Dear Readers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>961</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>961</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/962?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL SELECTION: Frosted Branch Angiitis With Ocular Toxoplasmosis]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/962?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ysasaga, Davis</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.962</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL SELECTION: Frosted Branch Angiitis With Ocular Toxoplasmosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>963</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>962</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Selection</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/964?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Alcohol Consumption and Compliance Among Inner-city Minority Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/964?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine the relation between alcohol consumption and self-reported compliance with prescribed therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus among underserved minority patients.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Cross-sectional sampling of consecutive patients with diabetes was performed following routine visits to their primary care physicians. Interviewers measured compliance using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Questionnaire and alcohol use using the timeline followback method and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Seven inner-city medical clinics that provide primary care services to low-income residents of South Central Los Angeles, Calif.</p><p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> A total of 392 ethnic minority patients (61% Hispanic, 29% African American) with type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Self-report compliance with prescribed diet, exercise, home glucose monitoring, medications, and outpatient follow-up.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Drinking any alcohol-containing beverage within 30 days was associated with poorer adherence to prescribed dietary recommendations for the consumption of fiber (<I>t</I> = 2.4; <I>P</I>&lt;.05), fat (<I>t</I> = 4.2; <I>P</I>&lt;.01), sweets (<I>t</I> = 2.7; <I>P</I>&lt;.01), and energy (calories) (<I>t</I> = 2.0; <I>P</I>&lt;.05). Drinkers were also less likely to exercise for at least 20 minutes per day (<I>t</I> = 2.2; <I>P</I>&lt;.05), comply with oral medication regimens (<I>t</I> = 4.6; <I>P</I>&lt;.01), or attend outpatient follow-up visits (<I>r</I> = &ndash;0.11; <I>P</I>&lt;.05). Alcohol use did not significantly alter compliance with home glucose monitoring, insulin use, or hemoglobin A<SUB>1c</SUB> levels, although there was a trend toward higher hemoglobin A<SUB>1c</SUB> levels among drinkers (11.0 vs 10.4). Multivariate analysis of the data demonstrates that when demographic characteristics, health care utilization, and other diabetes-related variables are held constant, the relation between alcohol use and dietary compliance remained significant.</p><p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Alcohol consumption may be associated with poorer compliance with recommendations for some self-care behaviors among inner-city minority patients with diabetes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Johnson, Bazargan, Bing</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drug Therapy, Adherence, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Treatment Adherence]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.964</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Alcohol Consumption and Compliance Among Inner-city Minority Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>970</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>964</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/971?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Using Geographic Information Systems to Understand Health Care Access]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/971?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Determining a community's health care access needs and testing interventions to improve access are difficult. This challenge is compounded by the task of translating the relevant data into a format that is clear and persuasive to policymakers and funding agencies. Geographic information systems can analyze and transform complex data from various sources into maps that illustrate problems effortlessly for experts and nonexperts.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To combine the patient data of a community health center (CHC) with health care survey data to display the CHC service area, the community's health care access needs, and relationships among access, poverty, and political boundaries.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Georeferencing, analyzing, and mapping information from 2 databases.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Boone County, Missouri.</p><p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Community health center patients and survey respondents.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Maps that define the CHC service area and patient demographics and show poor health care access in relation to the CHC service area, CHC utilization in relation to poverty, and rates of health care access by geopolitical region.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The CHC serves a distinctly different area than originally targeted. Subpopulations with unmet health care access needs and poverty were identified by census tract. These underserved populations fell within geopolitical boundaries that were easily linked to their elected officials.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Geographic information systems are powerful tools for combining disparate data in a visual format to illustrate complex relationships that affect health care access. These systems can help evaluate interventions, inform health services research, and guide health care policy.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Phillips, Kinman, Schnitzer, Lindbloom, Ewigman</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.971</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Using Geographic Information Systems to Understand Health Care Access]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>971</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/979?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Effectiveness of Pseudoephedrine Plus Acetaminophen for Treatment of Symptoms Attributed to the Paranasal Sinuses Associated With the Common Cold]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/979?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Little data exist on the cause and treatment of subfacial pain and pressure and other discomfort attributed to the paranasal sinuses that develop early during the course of the common cold. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of the combination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride with acetaminophen for the treatment of early symptoms during colds, which are attributed by the patient to the sinuses.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Four hundred thirty subjects (216, pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen recipients; 214, placebo recipients) with cold symptoms of 48 hours or less who reported overall "sinus" symptoms of at least moderate severity were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 2-dose study. Self-reported symptoms were scored (0 to 4, absent to severe) before and at 2 hours after the first and second doses. The 2 primary were measured 2 hours after the second dose were the overall sinus symptom assessment and a weighted composite assessment of sinus pressure, pain, and congestion (sinus symptoms).</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Compared with baseline, 2 hours after the second dose, the mean &plusmn; SEM overall sinus symptom assessment score had decreased by 1.30 &plusmn; 0.06 in the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen&ndash;treated subjects compared with 0.93 &plusmn; 0.06 in the placebo-treated subjects (<I>P</I>&le;.029). The mean &plusmn; SEM weighted average of sinus symptoms 2 hours after the second dose of study medication had decreased by 1.14 &plusmn; 0.06 in the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen&ndash;treated subjects compared with 0.84 &plusmn; 0.06 in the placebo-treated subjects (<I>P</I>&le;.029). Reductions in similar magnitude were also observed for each of the individual sinus symptoms, and headache and rhinorrhea. Nervousness occurred in 4% of the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen recipients compared with 0% of placebo recipients (<I>P</I> = .007).</p><p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Our results suggest that pseudoephedrine plus acetaminophen is effective for relief of symptoms attributable to the paranasal sinuses that may develop early in the course of a cold.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sperber, Turner, Sorrentino, O'Connor, Rogers, Gwaltney</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.979</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Effectiveness of Pseudoephedrine Plus Acetaminophen for Treatment of Symptoms Attributed to the Paranasal Sinuses Associated With the Common Cold]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>985</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/989?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Costs of Illness Due to Bordetella pertussis in Families]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/989?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess costs of pertussis morbidity among families in a community setting.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective survey.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Sixty-nine families (87 individuals) were studied. Twelve of 14 families with household contacts included an ill adolescent or parent. This individual was the first identified pertussis case within the household in 8 families. A family member required an average of 1.6 visits before (range, 0-7 visits) and after (range, 0-9 visits) pertussis was diagnosed; children younger than 1 year needed 2.5 and 2 visits, respectively. Symptomatic improvement occurred after a mean of 31 days (range, 4-134 days) after pertussis diagnosis and full recovery after a mean of 66 days (range, 5-383 days). Adults experienced the longest recovery time (median, 93 days) compared with other age groups. The average medical costs for an infant, child, adolescent, and adult were $2822, $308, $254, and $181, respectively. Parents lost an average of 6 workdays (range, 1-35 days) to care for an ill child; for these parents, costs associated with work loss averaged $767 per family. An average of 1.7 and 0.7 lost workdays accrued to bring an ill child to a physician's office and the emergency department, respectively. A majority (58%) of parents working while family members were ill with pertussis reported decreased work productivity ranging from 25% to 99%. Work-related costs contributed more than 60% of the overall costs of pertussis.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The adverse financial effect of pertussis on 69 families in Monroe County, New York, was $145&nbsp;903 ($2115 per family) and supports the need for booster immunizations in adolescents and adults.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Lee, Pichichero</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.989</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Costs of Illness Due to Bordetella pertussis in Families]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>996</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>989</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/997?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Does Drug Treatment of Patients With Acute Bronchitis Reduce Additional Care Seeking?: Evidence From the Practice Partner Research Network]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/997?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Considerable discussion has focused on treatment methods for patients with acute bronchitis.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine whether antibiotic or bronchodilator treatment is associated with differences in follow-up visit rates for patients with acute bronchitis.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for patients with a new episode of acute bronchitis over a 3-year period in the Practice Partner Research Network (29&nbsp;248 episodes in 24&nbsp;753 patients). Primary outcomes of interest were another visit in the next 14 days (early follow-up) or 15 to 28 days after initial treatment (late follow-up).</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Antibiotics were used more commonly in younger patients (&lt;18 years), whereas older patients (&gt;65 years) were more likely to receive no treatment. Younger patients treated with antibiotics were less likely to return for an early follow-up visit, but no differences were seen in adults and older patients. Late follow-up rates were not affected by the initial treatment strategy. When patients did return for a follow-up visit, no new medication was prescribed to most (66% of younger patients and 78% of older adults). However, compared with patients who did not receive an antibiotic at their first visit, patients initially treated with an antibiotic were about 50% more likely to receive a new antibiotic at their second visit.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Initial prescribing of an antibiotic reduces early follow-up for acute bronchitis in younger patients but seems to have no effect in adults. However, reductions in future follow-up visits might be outweighed by increases in antibiotic consumption because patients who return for a follow-up visit seem to receive additional antibiotic prescriptions.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Hueston, Jenkins, Mainous</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.997</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Does Drug Treatment of Patients With Acute Bronchitis Reduce Additional Care Seeking?: Evidence From the Practice Partner Research Network]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1001</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>997</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1002?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Prescription Medication Costs: A Study of Physician Familiarity]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1002?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Studies in the past 25 years have suggested that physicians are not familiar with the costs of common prescription medications.</p><p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To determine physician familiarity with the cost of common prescription medications and to determine the value physicians place on knowing information regarding the cost of medications.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Survey.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Seven community-based family medicine residency teaching clinics in Iowa.</p><p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Two hundred five practicing resident and faculty physicians.</p><p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> From a series of $10 price intervals (range, $0.01-$80.00), physicians were asked to select the interval containing the cash price of the medication to an uninsured patient for 50 medications commonly prescribed in outpatient family medicine clinics. Physicians were also questioned about the value of medication cost information to their practice.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The percentage of correct responses and the mean pricing scores were calculated for each respondent and for all medications.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> One hundred seventy-eight physicians responded (86.8%). Only 22.9% of the responses correctly identified the cost of the medication. More than two thirds (68.3%) of the responses underestimated the correct price interval. Branded drugs were underestimated in 89.9% of responses, while generic drugs were overestimated in 90.2% of responses. Overall, 64.4% of physicians believed they did not receive sufficient information in their practices regarding prescription drug costs, and nearly all (93.6%) reported that regular information on prescription medication costs would help them prescribe more cost-effectively.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Physicians are unfamiliar with the costs of medications they commonly prescribe, and they report that regular access to information on prescription medication costs would help them prescribe more cost-effectively.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ernst, Kelly, Hoehns, Swegle, Buys, Logemann, Ford, Kautzman, Sorofman, Pretorius</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Prescription Medication Costs: A Study of Physician Familiarity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1007</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1002</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1009?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Prevalence and Nature of Orofacial and Dental Problems in Family Medicine]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1009?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the prevalence and nature of orofacial and dental problems in 2 family medicine practices.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective, cross-sectional analysis of consecutive patient visits.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Urban and rural family medicine practices.</p><p><b>Patients and Participants&nbsp;</b> Four hundred seventy-two patients between age 10 and 86 years.</p><p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> None.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Prevalence and nature of patient visits to family medicine practices that were either initiated by problems in the region of the oral cavity or that involved questions raised by the patient concerning oral or perioral sites.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Twenty-one patients (4.5%) of 472 met the inclusion criteria, 16 (76%) of whom had an oral problem as the primary or secondary reason for their visit. Perioral pain and mucosal ulcerations were the most common problems, and gingival tissue was the most common location. Almost two thirds of these patients had bacterial, fungal, or viral infections. Regarding treatment, 13 (62%) of these patients received advice, 10 (48%) received prescriptions, and 3 (15%) were referred to a dentist or another medical specialist.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Oral and perioral problems are common in the practice of family medicine, which suggests the desirability for specific oral medicine topics in the training and continuing education of primary care physicians.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Lockhart, Mason, Konen, Kent, Gibson</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Dentistry/ Oral Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Prevalence and Nature of Orofacial and Dental Problems in Family Medicine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1012</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1009</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1015?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: A Survey of Primary Care Physician Practice Patterns and Adherence to Acute Low Back Problem Guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1015?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> This study evaluated physicians' self-reported management of acute low back problems in adults and adherence with published guidelines.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Self-administered written survey based on the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) guideline on acute low back problems in adults.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A region of northern Illinois with a population around 250&nbsp;000 and encompassing a medium-sized city.</p><p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> One hundred eighty-two primary care physicians (nonpediatric) with medical staff appointments at area hospitals.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Adherence to published recommendations.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Eighty-seven surveys were received for a 48% response rate. Overall, survey respondents recognized 5 of 7 red flags representing serious underlying abnormality 50% or less of the time. Forty percent (35/87) of physicians provided patients with written educational material, and only 25%(22/87) indicated they evaluated motor function of the fifth lumbar nerve, the most commonly affected level in intervertebral disk disease disease. About 25% (24/87) reported routine use of plain films; and 16% (14/87), routine use of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Most oral medication use was consistent with recommendations, but many also used drugs conditionally discouraged by the guideline (muscle relaxants, 91% [79/87]; opioids, 62% [54/87]) or cautioned against (oral steroids, 45% [39/87]; antidepressants, 23% [20/87]; injection therapy, 52% [45/87]). Only 22% (19/87) of respondents used or recommended manipulation.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The management of patients with acute low back problems by primary care physicians differs significantly from Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline recommendations in several key areas that include awareness of red flags, use of medication, use of radiographic studies, the need for patient education, and the use of physical modalities. Future research should focus on the impact of guideline compliance on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Di Iorio, Henley, Doughty</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: A Survey of Primary Care Physician Practice Patterns and Adherence to Acute Low Back Problem Guidelines]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1021</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1015</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1022?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: A Survey of Skin Cancer Screening in the Primary Care Setting: A Comparison With Other Cancer Screenings]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1022?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine primary care physicians' perceived importance and frequency of performance of skin cancer screening in comparison with other cancer screening examinations.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Descriptive survey study.</p><p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Five thousand US family physicians and internal medicine specialists randomly selected from the Official American Board of Medical Specialists Directory of Board-Certified Medical Specialists.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Self-reported importance and performance of cancer screening examinations.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Eligible physicians (1363 total: 814 family physicians and 549 internists) completed the survey with a response rate of 30%. Overall, 52% of respondents rated skin cancer screening as "extremely" important, compared with 79% for digital rectal examination, 88% for clinical breast examination, and 87% for Papanicolaou testing. Thirty-seven percent of physicians reported performing complete body skin examinations on 81% to 100% of patients, compared with digital rectal examination, for which 78% of physicians reported performing the examination on 81% to 100% of patients, or the clinical breast examination, for which 82% of physicians reported performing the examination on 81% to 100% of patients. A higher percentage of physicians in practice for more than 30 years ranked skin cancer screening as extremely important and reported a higher frequency of screening examinations. Physicians in a suburban practice setting reported performing skin examinations more often than those in urban or rural settings. Overall, the self-reported frequency of skin examination was strongly correlated with the physician's importance rating of skin cancer screening.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A majority of primary care physicians rate skin cancer screening as extremely important. The reported importance of skin cancer screening and frequency of skin cancer examination among primary care physicians is significantly less than for other cancer examinations. This likely represents a multitude of factors, including logistic constraints and lack of consensus on the efficacy of skin cancer screening.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Altman, Oliveria, Christos, Halpern</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Skin Cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: A Survey of Skin Cancer Screening in the Primary Care Setting: A Comparison With Other Cancer Screenings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1027</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1022</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Symptom Severity and Perceptions in Subjects With Panic Attacks]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To (1) identify aspects that defined the self-perceived worst panic attack, (2) determine how subjects with panic attacks perceive symptoms compared with control subjects, and (3) determine the role of symptom perceptions in seeking care for the worst panic attack.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Community-based.</p><p><b>Patients or Other Participants&nbsp;</b> Ninety-seven subjects with panic attacks as defined by the <I>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition</I> (with or without panic disorder), and 97 demographically matched controls.</p><p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> None.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Subjects and controls completed the Symptom Perception Scales, and subjects with panic attacks completed the Acute Panic Inventory and a questionnaire concerning care-seeking behavior for their self-perceived worst attack.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Compared with controls, subjects with panic attacks perceived many symptoms as more embarrassing but differed little in their perceptions of need for treatment, threat to life, and disruption of functioning. Particular symptoms (ie, dyspnea, fear, dizziness, and faintness) tended to differ in most perceptions. However, symptom perceptions did not play a significant role in care-seeking behavior for the worst attack.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Subjects with panic attacks perceive symptoms as more embarrassing than controls, and have different perceptions about particular symptoms. Cognitive approaches addressing negative patient perceptions may reduce anxiety, inappropriate use of health care services, and adverse outcomes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Katerndahl</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychiatry, Panic Disorder]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Symptom Severity and Perceptions in Subjects With Panic Attacks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1035</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1036?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Profile of Users of Real-Time Interactive Teleconference Clinical Consultations]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1036?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Real-time interactive teleconference clinical consultations are envisioned for increasing accessibility to medical care by patients whose demographics restrict care. There are no published studies, however, describing referrals and the referring practitioners, patients, and specialists participating in these consultations.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess characteristics of participants of interactive teleconference clinical consultations.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Descriptive study, February 1, 1996, through April 30, 1999.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Eastern North Carolina: Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University and 7 rural hospitals and clinics in its telemedicine network.</p><p><b>Subjects&nbsp;</b> Rural practitioners requesting consultations (n = 76), consulting physicians (n = 40), and patients completing evaluations following consultations (n = 495).</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Demographic and descriptive variables for referring providers, patients, and consulting physicians relative to the population in the region and to patients and physicians at the East Carolina University School of Medicine clinics.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The largest number of referrals (65.2%) were made to obtain a second opinion or recommend a management plan in dermatology (33.5%), allergy (21.0%), or cardiology (17.8%). Significant patient characteristics were race (56.8% minorities), age (19.6% &le;10 years old and 26.0% &ge;59.0 years old), sex (59% females), and insurance status (10.7% no insurance, 33.7% Medicaid, 15.4% Medicare). In addition, 38.0% had household incomes below the poverty level. Only 5.2% of the patients would have been treated by the referral practitioner, making travel necessary for consultation. Demographic characteristics of the practitioners were not statistically different.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Participants of interactive teleconference clinical consultations are patients whose access to medical care might otherwise be limited. Use of telemedicine by practitioners is not related to age or sex.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Gustke, Balch, Rogers, West</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Telemedicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Profile of Users of Real-Time Interactive Teleconference Clinical Consultations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1040</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1036</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1040?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Authors' Comment]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1040?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>West, Gustke</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Telemedicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Authors' Comment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1040</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1040</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1043?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Health Behaviors, Health Status, and Access to and Use of Health Care: A Population-Based Study of Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Women]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1043?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> There is a dearth of validated information about lesbian and bisexual women's health. To better understand some of these issues, we used population-based data to assess variations in health behaviors, health status, and access to and use of health care based on sexual orientation.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Our study population was drawn from a population-based sample of women, the 1997 Los Angeles County Health Survey. Participants reported their sexual orientation and these analyses included 4697 women: 4610 heterosexual women, 51 lesbians, and 36 bisexual women. We calculated adjusted relative risks to assess the effect of sexual orientation on important health issues.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Lesbians and bisexual women were more likely than heterosexual women to use tobacco products and to report any alcohol consumption, but only lesbians were significantly more likely than heterosexual women to drink heavily. Lesbians and bisexual women were less likely than heterosexual women to have health insurance, more likely to have been uninsured for health care during the preceding year, and more likely to have had difficulty obtaining needed medical care. During the preceding 2 years, lesbians, but not bisexual women, were less likely than heterosexual women to have had a Papanicolaou test and a clinical breast examination.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> In this first population-based study of lesbian and bisexual women's health, we found that lesbians and bisexual women were more likely than heterosexual women to have poor health behaviors and worse access to health care. These findings support our hypothesis that sexual orientation has an independent effect on health behaviors and receipt of care, and indicate the need for the increased systematic study of the relationship between sexual orientation and various aspects of health and health care.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Diamant, Wold, Spritzer, Gelberg</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Health Behaviors, Health Status, and Access to and Use of Health Care: A Population-Based Study of Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1051</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1043</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1052?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Can Depression Treatment in Primary Care Reduce Disability?: A Stepped Care Approach]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1052?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.</p><p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.</p><p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, <I>z</I> = 2.23; <I>P</I> = .025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36&ndash;defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (<I>z</I> = 1.63, <I>P</I> = .10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (<I>z</I> = 0.07, <I>P</I> = .94).</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Lin, VonKorff, Russo, Katon, Simon, Unutzer, Bush, Walker, Ludman</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychiatry, Depression, Rehabilitation Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Can Depression Treatment in Primary Care Reduce Disability?: A Stepped Care Approach]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1058</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1052</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1059?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Competing Demands From Physical Problems: Effect on Initiating and Completing Depression Care Over 6 Months]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1059?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective and Design&nbsp;</b> To evaluate a cohort of patients with major depression to examine the effect of competing demands on depression care during multiple visits over 6 months.</p><p><b>Participants and Setting&nbsp;</b> Ninety-two patients with 5 or more symptoms of depression and no recent depression treatment were evaluated by 12 primary care physicians in 6 practices in the usual-care arm of an effectiveness trial of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Depression Guidelines.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Treatment was considered to be initiated if the patient reported starting a guideline-concordant antidepressant medication or making a visit for specialty counseling. Treatment completion was defined as either a 3-month course of guideline-concordant antidepressant use or completion of 8 or more specialty counseling visits.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Among the 92 patients reporting no recent treatment at study enrollment, 57% reported starting and 17% reported completing a course of guideline-concordant antidepressant medication and or specialty counseling at the 6-month interview. The severity of physical problems among patients with high enthusiasm for depression treatment decreased the odds that patients would initiate depression therapy. Severity of physical problems had no observable effect on completing depression therapy in the group of patients who initiated treatment.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Physical problems compete with depression for attention over multiple visits in untreated patients who are enthusiastic about getting care for their emotional problems. Interventions are needed for this high-risk group, because depression treatment could potentially enhance patients' treatment of their physical problems.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Nutting, Rost, Smith, Werner, Elliot</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychiatry, Depression]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Competing Demands From Physical Problems: Effect on Initiating and Completing Depression Care Over 6 Months]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1064</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1059</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1066?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Clues to Early Alzheimer Dementia in the Outpatient Setting]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1066?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> As the elderly population booms and the prevalence of dementia soars, it becomes imperative that primary care physicians recognize early dementia within their own practices. Early recognition and diagnosis of dementia will allow appropriate intervention and treatment to improve morbidity.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine the most common symptoms associated with early Alzheimer disease (AD), as presented by patients and their families, and to compare these with the recommendations of the "7-Minute Screen" by Solomon et al for the identification of AD and the recommendations of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) for the early recognition of dementia.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A retrospective medical record review was conducted in an outpatient referral population within 2 geriatric evaluation centers. Patient medical record selection was based on <I>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition</I> criteria for AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 23 or higher, a Geriatric Depression Scale score of less than 5, age above 60 years, and at least an eighth-grade level of education.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> From 1025 medical records reviewed, 50 patients were chosen who fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Forty patients (80%) missed at least 2, if not all 3, recall items on the MMSE. Thirty patients (60%) had difficulty managing finances and/or balancing a checkbook; 16 (32%) frequently repeated stories and statements; 15 (30%) became lost while driving; 10 (20%) frequently forgot the names of relatives; and 10 (20%) had poor judgment. These results demonstrated a high correlation with recall as a diagnostic factor in diagnosing early AD as found in the 7-Minute Screen. Moreover, these "clues" correlated well with the AHCPR's symptoms that indicate dementia. The symptoms specifically overlapped in the areas of learning and retaining new information (repetition), handling complex tasks (calculation), reasoning ability (judgment), and spatial ability and orientation (driving).</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> There may be a constellation of symptoms associated with early AD. This constellation includes missing recall items on the MMSE, difficulty in calculation, repetition, getting lost while driving, forgetting the names of relatives, and having poor judgment. Recall is the symptom most consistent with the findings of the 7-Minute Screen in diagnosing AD. However, repetition, calculation, judgment, and driving highly correlate with the AHCPR's dementia symptom checklist. Therefore, if primary care physicians keep this constellation of symptoms in mind while evaluating their geriatric population, they will have greater ability to suspect, diagnose, and treat AD at an early stage.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Holzer, Warshaw</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Alzheimer Disease, Dementias, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Clues to Early Alzheimer Dementia in the Outpatient Setting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1070</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1066</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1071?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Risks Associated With the Practice of Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Australian Study]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1071?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate the nature and frequency of adverse events that occur as a result of the practice of traditional Chinese medicine (acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine) in Australia.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Data on adverse events were obtained as part of a comprehensive survey of all occupational health groups, government-registered and unregistered, who practiced traditional Chinese medicine or 1 of its main modalities.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Practitioners reported numerous adverse events arising from the application of acupuncture (including fainting, nausea and vomiting, and increased pain), or the consumption of Chinese herbal medicines (including direct toxic effects and allergic reactions). Practitioners experienced an average of 1 adverse event every 8 to 9 months of full-time practice or 1 adverse event for every 633 consultations. The mean adverse event rate of nonmedical practitioners was less than half the mean adverse event rate of medical practitioners.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The practices of acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine are not risk-free and fatalities have occurred. Variation in adverse event rates between medical and nonmedical practitioners may reflect differences in relevant education or different reporting behaviors. These data represent the first step in the evaluation of adverse event rates in traditional Chinese medicine.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Bensoussan, Myers, Carlton</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Complementary and Alternative Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Risks Associated With the Practice of Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Australian Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1078</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1071</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1079?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Self-reported Health, Illness, and Self-care Among Finnish Physicians: A National Survey]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1079?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Physicians' health problems have been discussed mainly in relation to substance abuse and psychiatric disorders. In this study, the prevalence of common chronic diseases and their treatment were determined.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To find differences in self-reported health status, amount of sick leave, and the use of health services among physicians according to sex and specialty. Data were also compared with those of the total employed population.</p><p><b>Design and Setting&nbsp;</b> Cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey in Finland.</p><p><b>Participants and Methods&nbsp;</b> A random sample of licensed physicians younger than 66 years (n = 4477) was randomly selected from the register of the Finnish Medical Association. A total of 3313 physicians (74%) responded.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Perceived health, prevalence of diseases, self-treatment of diseases, amount of sick leave, and medical consultations.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Female physicians assessed their health as being better than other female employees and had used health services and had been on sick leave more often than their male colleagues. Male physicians assessed their health as being equal to that of other men. Both female and male physicians had fewer sick leave than other employees. However, physicians&mdash;especially men&mdash;reported many common chronic illnesses as often or more often than other employees. Physicians had consulted other medical professionals less often than other employees, and they primarily self-treated their illnesses. Of the specialties, psychiatrists had used health services and had been on sick leave more often than other physicians.</p><p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> This study indicates that the usual form of care of physicians' diseases is self-treatment and "working through" illnesses.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Toyry, Rasanen, Kujala, Aarimaa, Juntunen, Kalimo, Luhtala, Makela, Myllymaki, Seuri, Husman</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Self-reported Health, Illness, and Self-care Among Finnish Physicians: A National Survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1085</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1079</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1086?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Factors Associated With Emergency Department Utilization for Nonurgent Pediatric Problems]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1086?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To identify specific caretaker and utilization characteristics predictive of the use of the emergency departments (EDs) for nonurgent reasons. Each year more than 20 million children in the United States seek medical care in EDs. Between one third and one half of these visits are for nonurgent reasons.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A descriptive study conducted during a 6-month period.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Two urban hospital EDs.</p><p><b>Measure&nbsp;</b> A questionnaire was designed to elicit information about specific caretaker characteristics and their reasons for using the ED for their child's nonurgent medical care.</p><p><b>Subjects&nbsp;</b> Two hundred caretakers and children brought to the ED for nonacute medical care. Caretakers in this study included mothers (82%) with a mean age of 30 years, single caretakers (70%), and unemployed caretakers (60%). The average age of the children was 6.2 years.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Most caretakers (92%) reported having a continuity physician for their children. Caretakers who reported being taken to the ED when they were children (<I>P</I>&lt;.002) and those with Medicaid insurance (<I>P</I>&lt;.001) were more likely to view the ED as the usual site of care. Being a single parent was a predictor for nonurgent visits (<I>P</I>&lt;.05).</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Predicting which caretakers are at risk for using the ED for nonurgent care when their children are sick provides the primary care physician a means of identifying specific patients who may benefit from interventions designed to promote a more cost-effective approach to using medical resources.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Phelps, Taylor, Kimmel, Nagel, Klein, Puczynski</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Emergency Medicine, Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Factors Associated With Emergency Department Utilization for Nonurgent Pediatric Problems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1092</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1086</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1093?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Who Gets Screened During Pregnancy for Partner Violence?]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1093?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Context&nbsp;</b> Despite recommendations to screen prenatal care patients for partner violence, the prevalence of such screening is unknown.</p><p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To estimate the statewide prevalence of partner violence screening during prenatal care among a representative sample of North Carolina women with newborns and to compare women screened for partner violence with women not screened.</p><p><b>Design, Setting, and Participants&nbsp;</b> This investigation examines data gathered through the North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a random sample of more than 2600 recently postpartum women who were delivered of newborns between July 1997 and December 1998.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Self-reports of violence, health service factors, and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><b>Analysis&nbsp;</b> The prevalence of screening was computed, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine bivariate and multivariable associations between being screened for partner violence and other factors.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Thirty-seven percent of women reported being screened for partner violence during prenatal care. Logistic regression analysis found that women were more likely to be screened if they received prenatal care from (1) a public provider paid by a public source; (2) a private provider paid by a public source; or (3) a public provider paid by a private source.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> These findings suggest that the majority of prenatal care patients in North Carolina are not screened for partner violence. Screening appears to be most highly associated with whether a woman is a patient in the public sector or the private sector, and with the source of payment for prenatal care.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Clark, Martin, Petersen, Cloutier, Covington, Buescher, Beck-Warden</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Violence and Human Rights, Violence and Human Rights, Other, Women's Health, Pregnancy and Breast Feeding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Who Gets Screened During Pregnancy for Partner Violence?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1099</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1093</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: A Comparison of Family Medicine Research in Research Intense and Less Intense Institutions]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Family medicine is a relatively new specialty that has been trying to develop a research base for 30 years. It is unclear how institutional research success and emphasis have affected the research productivity of family medicine departments.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine the research infrastructure, productivity, and barriers to productivity in academic family medicine in research intense and less intense institutions.</p><p><b>Design, Setting, and Participants&nbsp;</b> A survey of 124 chairs among institutional members of the Association of Departments of Family Medicine. Departments were categorized as being associated with research intense institutions (defined as the top 40 in National Institute of Health funding) or less intense institutions.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Prioritization of research as a mission, number of funded research grants, total number of research articles published, and number of faculty and staff conducting research.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The response rate was 55% (N = 68). Of 5 potential ratings on the survey, research was the fourth highest departmental priority in both categories of institutions. Departments in research intense institutions were larger, had more faculty on investigational tracks, and employed more research support staff (<I>P</I>&lt;.05). Neither category of department published a large number (median = 10 in both groups) of peer-reviewed articles per year. Controlling for the number of full-time equivalent faculty, the departments in less intense institutions published a median of 0.7 articles, while the research intense institutions published 0.5 (<I>P</I> = .30). Departments in research intense institutions received more grant funding (<I>P</I>&lt;.005) in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Chairs reported a scarcity of qualified applicants for research physician faculty openings.</p><p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Future initiatives should focus on prioritizing research and creating a critical mass of researchers in family medicine.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Mainous, Hueston, Ye, Bazell</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Statistics and Research Methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: A Comparison of Family Medicine Research in Research Intense and Less Intense Institutions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Why Family Practice Research?]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Weiss</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Statistics and Research Methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Why Family Practice Research?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Selection Bias From Requiring Patients to Give Consent to Examine Data for Health Services Research]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> New rulings nationwide require health services researchers to obtain patient consent before examining personally identifiable data. A selection bias may result if consenting patients differ from those who do not give consent.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare patients who consent, refuse, and do not answer.</p><p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Patients completing an in-office survey were asked for permission to be surveyed at home and for their records to be reviewed. Survey responses and practice billing data were used to compare patients by consent status.</p><p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Urban family practice center.</p><p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Of 2046 eligible patients, 1106 were randomly selected for the survey, were approached by staff, and agreed to participate. Approximately 87% of the nonparticipants were eliminated through a randomization process.</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Consent status.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 33% of patients did not give consent: 25% actively refused, and 8% did not answer. Consenting patients were older, included fewer women and African Americans, and reported poorer physical function than those who did not give consent (<I>P</I>&lt;.05). Patients who did not answer the question were older, included more women and African Americans, and were less educated than those who answered (<I>P</I>&lt;.02). Visits for certain reasons (eg, pelvic infections) were associated with lower consent rates. On multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, and lower functional status were significant predictors of consent.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients who release personal information for health services research differ in important characteristics from those who do not. In this study, older patients and those in poorer health were more likely to grant consent. Quality and health services research restricted to patients who give consent may misrepresent outcomes for the general population.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Woolf, Rothemich, Johnson, Marsland</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Ethics, Statistics and Research Methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Selection Bias From Requiring Patients to Give Consent to Examine Data for Health Services Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1118</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SOAP: SOLUTIONS TO OFTEN-ASKED PROBLEMS: Are No-Suicide Contracts Effective in Preventing Suicide in Suicidal Patients Seen by Primary Care Physicians?]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Kelly, Knudson</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SOAP: SOLUTIONS TO OFTEN-ASKED PROBLEMS: Are No-Suicide Contracts Effective in Preventing Suicide in Suicidal Patients Seen by Primary Care Physicians?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOAP: Solutions to Often-Asked Problems</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SOAP: SOLUTIONS TO OFTEN-ASKED PROBLEMS: Athletes Resuming Activity After Infectious Mononucleosis]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Burroughs</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SOAP: SOLUTIONS TO OFTEN-ASKED PROBLEMS: Athletes Resuming Activity After Infectious Mononucleosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOAP: Solutions to Often-Asked Problems</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[DRUG THERAPY: Rofecoxib, a New Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitor, Shows Sustained Efficacy, Comparable With Other Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A 6-Week and a 1-Year Trial in Patients With Osteoarthritis]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Introduction&nbsp;</b> Rofecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor (sometimes known as a specific cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor or Coxib), is used in osteoarthritis (OA). Published information indicates rofecoxib's improved gastrointestinal safety profile over nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs).</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rofecoxib in treating OA in 2 studies.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients with OA of the knee or hip were conducted using identical entry criteria and end points. A 6-week placebo-controlled trial in 736 patients compared 12.5 and 25 mg of rofecoxib once daily with 800 mg of ibuprofen 3 times daily, and a 1-year study compared 12.5 and 25 mg of rofecoxib once daily with 50 mg of diclofenac 3 times daily in 693 patients.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Rofecoxib, at 12.5 and 25 mg, demonstrated efficacy clinically comparable with ibuprofen, assessed by 3 primary end points according to predefined comparability criteria. Both rofecoxib doses and ibuprofen provided significantly greater efficacy than placebo on all primary end points at 6 weeks. Both rofecoxib doses and diclofenac showed similar efficacy over 1 year. All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Rofecoxib is effective in treating OA with once-daily dosing for 6 weeks and 1 year. Rofecoxib was generally safe and well-tolerated in OA patients for 6 weeks and 1 year.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Saag, van der Heijde, Fisher, Samara, DeTora, Bolognese, Sperling, Daniels, for the Osteoarthritis Studies Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Rheumatology, Osteoarthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[DRUG THERAPY: Rofecoxib, a New Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitor, Shows Sustained Efficacy, Comparable With Other Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A 6-Week and a 1-Year Trial in Patients With Osteoarthritis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Drug Therapy</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[DRUG THERAPY: New Antiepileptic Drugs: Into the New Millennium]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been an explosion of new antiepileptic drug availability for physicians to treat patients with recurrent seizures. Principal antiepileptic drugs consisted of 6 key agents for both generalized and partial epilepsy for nearly 8 decades. Since 1993, the availability of newer "second-generation" agents has nearly doubled the armamentarium available for the 2.5 million patients who have recurrent seizures. This new influx of medications has flooded the medical and lay community with choices never before appreciated. The promise of improved tolerability with different safety and efficacy profiles has been exciting for all involved in epilepsy management. While most of the newer agents have been approved for adjunctive use in medically refractory partial epilepsy with recurrent complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures, efficacy is expanding to include generalized epilepsy and children for some agents.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Tatum, Galvez, Benbadis, Carrazana</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Epilepsy, Seizures, Nonepileptic]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[DRUG THERAPY: New Antiepileptic Drugs: Into the New Millennium]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Drug Therapy</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL REVIEW: The Neurosurgical Treatment of Epilepsy]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the new advancements in antiepileptic drug development, thousands of people with epilepsy will remain intractable to medication. For a considerable proportion of these people, epilepsy surgery is a consideration for better control of their seizures. Resective surgery is now standard practice for patients with medication-refractory epilepsy. Temporal lobectomy continues to be the most common surgery performed. Once patients fail 2 to 3 optimal trials of antiepileptic medication, further drug therapy offers a minimal number of patients freedom from seizures. In contrast, temporal lobectomy in carefully selected patients may result in seizure-free outcomes in more than 70% to 90% of patients with intractable seizures. As technology and drug availability increases in the new millennium, it is important for the primary care physician to be aware of epilepsy surgery as a means to treat patients with antiepileptic drug&ndash;refractory epilepsy.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Tatum, Benbadis, Vale</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Neurosurgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL REVIEW: The Neurosurgical Treatment of Epilepsy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1147</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1148?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL REVIEW: Visit-Specific Expectations and Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Literature Review]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1148?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Primary care patients often have certain expectations when visiting physicians, many of which may be undetected. These unmet expectations can affect outcomes such as satisfaction with care. We performed a formal literature review to examine the effect of fulfillment of patients' visit-specific expectations on their satisfaction as well as on health status and compliance.</p><p><b>Patients and Methods&nbsp;</b> Included studies were conducted in primary care settings, systematically recruited patients, elicited previsit and/or postvisit expectations relative to specific visits, and measured patient-centered outcomes. Two reviewers abstracted information on study characteristics; types, timing, and method of expectation ascertainment; and outcomes. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Twenty-three studies were reviewed including 7 trials, 4 cohort studies, and 12 cross-sectional studies. Patients frequently expected information rather than specific physician actions, but physicians often did not accurately perceive patients' visit-specific expectations. In 19 studies that assessed postvisit patient satisfaction, a positive association between meeting patient expectations and overall satisfaction was demonstrated in 11 studies, inconclusive in 3, and not established in 5. In 2 studies assessing physician satisfaction, physicians with access to patients' expectations were more satisfied than those without access. Other outcomes (symptom or disease improvement, health status, test ordering, health care costs, psychological symptoms) were measured in only a few studies, and the results were inconclusive.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Addressing patients' visit-specific expectations appears to affect satisfaction to a modest degree. Future studies should evaluate methods that efficiently elicit, prioritize, and provide patients' previsit expectations for physicians and should examine the longitudinal effect of expectation fulfillment on patient outcomes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Rao, Weinberger, Kroenke</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL REVIEW: Visit-Specific Expectations and Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Literature Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1148</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1156?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Perceptions of Physician Style and Trust]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1156?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Context&nbsp;</b> While pervasive racial and ethnic inequalities in access to care and health status have been documented, potential underlying causes, such as patients' perceptions of their physicians, have not been explored as thoroughly.</p><p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess whether a person's race or ethnicity is associated with low trust in the physician.</p><p><b>Design, Setting, and Participants&nbsp;</b> Data were obtained from the 1996 through 1997 Community Tracking Survey, a nationally representative sample. Adults who identified a physician as their regular provider and had at least 1 physician visit in the preceding 12 months were included (N = 32&nbsp;929).</p><p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Patients' ratings of their satisfaction with the style of their physician and their trust in physicians. The Satisfaction With Physician Style Scale measured respondents' perceptions of their physicians' listening skills, explanations, and thoroughness. The Trust in Physician Scale measured respondents' perceptions that their physicians placed the patients' needs above other considerations, referred the patient when needed, performed unnecessary tests or procedures, and were influenced by insurance rules.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> After adjustment for socioeconomic and other factors, minority group members reported less positive perceptions of physicians than whites on these 2 conceptually distinct scales. Minority group members who lacked physician continuity on repeat clinic visits reported even less positive perceptions of their physicians on these 2 scales than whites.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups have less positive perceptions of their physicians on at least 2 important dimensions. The reasons for these differences should be explored and addressed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Doescher, Saver, Franks, Fiscella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Perceptions of Physician Style and Trust]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Contribution</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1164?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: The Physician-Patient Relationship: Three Psychodynamic Concepts That Can Be Applied to Primary Care]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1164?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Psychodynamic concepts can be used to help understand and manage certain difficulties that arise within the physician-patient relationship. The concepts of <I>transference</I>, <I>countertransference</I>, and <I>action</I> (in the form of acting out and enactment) are discussed. A case description is included to show how these concepts apply to the day-to-day practice of primary care medicine.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Goldberg</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: The Physician-Patient Relationship: Three Psychodynamic Concepts That Can Be Applied to Primary Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1168</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1164</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1169?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Enhancing Drug Compliance in Lipid-Lowering Treatment]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1169?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hyperlipidemia and the atherosclerotic conditions that result from it are well recognized as major contributors to coronary heart disease (CHD). Fortunately, several large-scale clinical trials have shown that there are effective treatments that can substantially lower atherogenic lipid levels and thereby reduce the risk of CHD mortality and morbidity. However, duplication of these dramatic trial results can be negatively affected in "real life" clinical practice by an important issue: compliance. No medications will work if patients do not take them. Unfortunately, patients who need lipid-lowering therapy are likely to need it long-term, perhaps for a lifetime. Yet, many do not adhere to the prescribed medication regimen. This article reviews some major studies of compliance for lipid-lowering drugs. The reasons why patients do not take them as prescribed vary: poor education, lack of understanding, cost, provider indifference, and others. Achieving compliance requires a multifaceted approach. It can be enhanced by encouraging patients to talk openly about their medication habits and by convincing them of the long-term benefits of reaching and maintaining target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Although more studies focusing on compliance specifically regarding CHD are needed, the current literature does provide some guidance.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>LaRosa, LaRosa</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drug Therapy, Adherence, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Lipids and Lipid Disorders, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Treatment Adherence]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Enhancing Drug Compliance in Lipid-Lowering Treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Gaps in End-of-Life Care]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Every year, more than 1 million Americans die of different causes. Some die easily and comfortably. Others die with a great deal of suffering and distress. This article contrasts key aspects of the way Americans die with the way they say they would like to die. It will also highlight some of the barriers to providing high-quality end-of-life care.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Emanuel, von Gunten, Ferris</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1176</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Gaps in End-of-Life Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1180</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1181?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Advance Care Planning]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1181?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Advance care planning is the process of planning for future medical care, particularly for the event when the patient is unable to make his or her own decisions. It should be a routine part of standard medical care and, when possible, conducted with the proxy decision maker present. It is helpful to think of the process as a stepwise approach. The steps include the appropriate introduction of the topic, structured discussions covering potential scenarios, documentation of preferences, periodic review and update of the directives, and application of the wishes when needed. The steps can be integrated flexibly into routine clinical encounters by the physician and other members of the health care team. The process fosters personal resolution for the patient, preparedness for the proxy, and effective teamwork for the professionals. The process also has pitfalls of which to be aware.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Emanuel, von Gunten, Ferris</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1181</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Advance Care Planning]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[BRIEF REPORT: Microscopic Polyangiitis in a Pediatric Patient]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), previously called hypersensitivity angiitis, is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis that involves many organ systems including the skin, joints, kidneys, and lungs. Microscopic polyangiitis most commonly affects adults in the fourth and fifth decades of life, with only a few cases reported in children. We describe a pediatric patient with microscopic polyangiitis.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Kandeel, Ramesh, Chen, Celik, Jenis, Ambrus</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1189</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[BRIEF REPORT: Microscopic Polyangiitis in a Pediatric Patient]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[BRIEF REPORT: Case Description of Ascariasis]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Ascaris lumbricoides</I> are among the medically important worms belonging to the phylum Nematoda (roundworms) that are parasites of the human gastrointestinal tract. Despite current sanitation and hygiene standards in the United States, infection due to intestinal roundworms is not uncommon in children and adults. A high index of suspicion is warranted as patients may present anywhere along a spectrum of illness from asymptomatic to acutely ill. The following is a case presentation and discussion of <I>Ascaris lumbricoides</I>, the common roundworm or intestinal longworm.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Clinch, Stephens</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[BRIEF REPORT: Case Description of Ascariasis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1194</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[BRIEF REPORT: Phytophotodermatitis: A Sometimes Difficult Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Phytophotodermatitis may not be diagnosed when a patient is seen with erythema and vesicles on the skin. However, with the appropriate medical history, the diagnosis of phytophotodermatitis is easily made.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Solis, Dotson, Trizna</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Dermatology, Dermatologic Disorders, Photosensitivity Disorders, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[BRIEF REPORT: Phytophotodermatitis: A Sometimes Difficult Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LIVING IN MEDICINE: Med School After 50 Years Plus 2 Weeks]]></title>
<link>http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/9/10/1197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[(No abstract is available for this citation)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Spudis</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LIVING IN MEDICINE: Med School After 50 Years Plus 2 Weeks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2000-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Living in Medicine</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>