JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
  Vol. 6 No. 6, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Improving the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smear results

D. McKee
Department of Family Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. mckee@aecom.yu.edu

A review of the literature on adherence with recommended follow-up after an abnormal screening Papanicolaou smear result reveals that many women do not receive adequate follow-up. Primary care providers can influence the number of women who undergo timely colposcopy or a subsequent Papanicolaou smear by addressing common barriers to follow-up. Physicians should anticipate fears commonly experienced by women when they learn of abnormal Papanicolaou smear results, including fear of cancer, fear of pain during colposcopy, and fear of loss of sexual or reproductive function. An awareness that certain populations are at especially high risk of inadequate follow-up, including black and Hispanic women, women with less than a high school education, and women of low socioeconomic status, can help physicians target their efforts. Practical strategies for improving follow-up include speaking directly with the patient about results, emphasizing the precancerous nature of most lesions, actively preparing the patient for colposcopy by describing the procedure and its complications, and addressing fears about the common treatment options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Office-based reminder systems and educational materials may also be used as adjuncts to personal contact.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Compliance After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cold Knife Cone Biopsy
Greenspan et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:675-680.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychological and Sociocultural Perspectives on Follow-up of Abnormal Papanicolaou Results
Breitkopf et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1347-1354.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is the Promise of Cancer-Screening Programs Being Compromised? Quality of Follow-Up Care after Abnormal Screening Results
Yabroff et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2003;60:294-331.
ABSTRACT  

Do Follow-up Recommendations for Abnormal Papanicolaou Smears Influence Patient Adherence?
Melnikow et al.
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:510-514.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Barriers to Follow-up of Abnormal Papanicolaou Smears in an Urban Community Health Center
McKee et al.
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:129-134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reducing Mortality Due to Cervical Cancer: PAPNET Fails the Test
Melnikow and Nuovo
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:56-57.
FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.