JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
  Vol. 3 No. 5, May 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Relationship between patient self-ratings and physician ratings of general health, depression, and anxiety

G. Wyshak and A. J. Barsky
Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patient self-ratings and physician ratings of general health, depression, and anxiety and patient and physician ratings in comparison to Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) diagnoses of depression and anxiety. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: A general medical outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Clinic attendees. METHOD: Consecutive clinic attendees on randomly selected days completed a self-reported screening questionnaire for hypochondriasis, composed of the Whiteley Index and the Somatic Symptom Inventory. A random sample of patients (N = 79), 95% of whom had scores below the cutoff for hypochondriasis (n = 75) and 5% of whom had scores at or above the cutoff for hypochondriasis (N = 4), returned at a later date to complete a research battery consisting of self-reported questionnaires, structured and semistructured interviews, and a structured interview for diagnoses of anxiety and depression based on the DIS, which used criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition. OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to questionnaires and interviews. RESULTS: Agreement between patients and physicians was statistically significant concerning patients' physical health, depression, and anxiety. Based on one question, both physicians' and patients' ratings of depression and anxiety compared favorably with DIS diagnoses. By means of receiver operating characteristics analysis, values for the areas under the curve and their SEs were as follows: for depression, 0.789 +/- 0.075 for patient self-ratings and 0.825 +/- 0.054 for physician ratings; for anxiety, 0.734 +/- 0.058 for patient self-ratings and 0.667 +/- 0.065 for physician ratings. CONCLUSION: One simple question about a patient's status with respect to depression or anxiety is sufficient to detect these disorders with high sensitivity and specificity, yielding values comparable to those yielded by instruments consisting of many items. Asking patients to rate their own levels of depression and anxiety may constitute one portion of the family physician's diagnostic assessment for these conditions.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Ten-Year Review of the Validity and Clinical Utility of Depression Screening
Schade et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1998;49:55-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.